Phase Transitions in Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN): A Statistical Physics Perspective

Abstract:

This article explores the intriguing parallels between recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and spin systems in statistical physics. By modeling neurons as binary spins, we uncover how RNNs can undergo phase transitions akin to those observed in physical systems, such as the transition from liquid to gas. Utilizing the Metropolis algorithm, we simulate the energy landscape of RNNs and observe changes in magnetization over time, revealing a reduction in stable states—a hallmark of phase transitions. This interdisciplinary approach offers a novel lens for understanding the dynamics of deep learning models and suggests potential pathways for designing more stable and interpretable neural networks.

---

Introduction

Have you ever noticed the peculiar sounds and bubbling of water in a kettle each morning? In physics, this phenomenon is known as a phase transition—a dramatic shift from one state of matter to another, such as from liquid to steam. Interestingly, recurrent neural networks (RNNs), a class of artificial neural networks designed for processing sequential data, can experience similar phase transitions. This article delves into the fascinating intersection of deep learning and statistical physics, exploring how RNNs can be analyzed using concepts traditionally applied to physical systems like collections of magnets, or spins.

Neurons and Spins: A Mathematical Equivalence

In artificial neural networks, a neuron can be either active or inactive. Similarly, in physics, a simple binary magnet, or spin, can be in one of two states: up or down. Remarkably, the probability of a neuron being active or inactive mirrors the probability of a spin being up or down. This equivalence becomes particularly insightful when we consider the total input to a neuron—determined by the weights of its connections and biases—as analogous to the negative inverse temperature in a spin system.

Extending this analogy to an entire neural network, the probabilities of different network states align mathematically with those of a collection of physical binary magnets, described by the Ising model in statistical physics. In this model, each spin interacts with its neighbors, much like neurons in a network interact to form structured representations.

Recurrent Neural Networks and Their Physical Counterparts

Unlike feedforward neural networks, where information flows in a single direction, RNNs incorporate loops, allowing them to retain information from previous steps. This feedback mechanism enables RNNs to handle sequential tasks, such as language modeling and time series prediction. The dynamic behavior of RNNs, influenced by their past states, can be studied through the lens of statistical mechanics.

By drawing parallels between RNNs and spin systems, we can express the probability distribution of an RNN's state as:

\[ P^{(T)} = \frac{1}{Z} \exp \left( y^{(T)} \left[ b_0 + W_1^{hy} S_1^{(T)} + \dots + W_N^{hy} S_N^{(T)} \right] + \sum_{t=0}^{T} \sum_{i=1}^{N} S_i^{(t)} \left[ b_i + \sum_{j=1}^{M} W_{ij}^{xh} X_j^{(t)} + \sum_{j=1}^{N} W_{ij}^{hh} S_j^{(t-1)} \right] \right) \]

Here, \( t \) represents time, \( T \) is the current time, \( S \) denotes hidden neurons, \( y \) is the output neuron, and \( x \) refers to input neurons. The parameters \( b \) and \( W \) correspond to biases and weights, respectively.

Assuming the system reaches equilibrium at each time step, we can interpret this probability distribution in terms of energy:

\[ E = - y^{(T)} \left[ b_0 + W_1^{hy} S_1^{(T)} + \dots + W_N^{hy} S_N^{(T)} \right] - \sum_{t=0}^{T} \sum_{i=1}^{N} S_i^{(t)} \left[ b_i + \sum_{j=1}^{M} W_{ij}^{xh} X_j^{(t)} + \sum_{j=1}^{N} W_{ij}^{hh} S_j^{(t-1)} \right] \]

This formulation reveals that the current energy state depends on both present and past neuron activations, highlighting the temporal dependencies inherent in RNNs.

Simulating RNN Dynamics Using the Metropolis Algorithm

To explore the behavior of RNNs through this physical analogy, we employ the Metropolis algorithm—a computational technique used to simulate the states of systems with known probability distributions. We generate a pseudo-sequential dataset, akin to stock market behavior, and feed it into the RNN. In the corresponding spin system, this input acts as an external magnetic field, alongside the bias term.

We fix the free parameters (weights and biases) and implement the derived energy function. Running simulations over time steps \( t = 1 \) to \( t = 200 \), we generate 5,000 configurations at each step. For each configuration, we calculate the magnetization—the average spin state—ranging from -1 (all spins down) to +1 (all spins up).

By tracking magnetization over time, we observe how the RNN's behavior evolves, potentially undergoing phase transitions.

Observing Phase Transitions in RNNs

Plotting energy against magnetization over time reveals a linear decrease in energy, suggesting a trend toward negative infinity. This behavior parallels the exploding or vanishing gradient problem in machine learning, where gradients become excessively large or small during training.

At \( t = 0 \), the system exhibits four distinct magnetization states. Around \( t = 50 \), these reduce to two, with their positions shifting along the magnetization axis. This change indicates a phase transition—a fundamental shift in the system's behavior.

Applying the Landau approach, we define magnetization as a macroscopic variable and derive the effective free energy \( F \).

Code: